Skip to content

The Index · Public sector · Problem 0022

Unsearchable council recordsResidents can't find what their council decided

Local government publishes its decisions (planning, licensing, budgets, minutes) and publishing is where the obligation stops. They arrive as scanned documents with inconsistent names, in systems searchable only if you already know what you are looking for. A decision that changes a street is technically public and practically private.

Framed by Ainna's innovation team

Who lives with it
Residents and neighbourhood groups · local reporters · small developers and community organisations
Why now
Local newsrooms have continued to close in many markets, removing the layer that used to read these documents on everyone else's behalf.
Why it matters
The information is already public, already funded and already digital. Making it findable is a data problem rather than a political one, which is why it is tractable, and why it keeps falling between mandates.
On the Index
Framed by Ainna's innovation team from a condition most readers will recognise, so no source is claimed. Published in Edition 1.

Ainna frames what it reads; it does not report. Nothing on the Index comes from a user, and what you bring to Ainna is never published.

More on the Index

Three more worth solving.

Public sector

Digital identity exclusionPeople without ID lose the services that moved online

Benefits, banking, health records and school places are moving to interfaces that begin by asking you to prove who you are online. Hundreds of millions of people cannot prove who they are at all, and billions more have no digital means of doing it, so each service added to the digital channel quietly removes itself from the people who most need it, while the statistics record improved efficiency.

For whomPeople without foundational or digital ID · agencies moving services online · the frontline staff handling every exception by hand
LinkedIn Send to someone

Inspired by reporting from World Bank ID4D

Food

Unmeasured supply lossGrowers and buyers can't see the food lost between them

Loss happens at the handovers: field to packer, packer to distributor, distributor to shelf. Every party measures only its own side of each one. So each set of numbers looks defensible while the total is enormous, and the interventions that would work are precisely the ones nobody can see, because they sit between two businesses rather than inside one.

For whomGrowers and packers · distributors and independent retailers · redistribution charities working the same corridors
LinkedIn Send to someone

Inspired by reporting from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Health

Uncoordinated family careFamilies coordinate elder care in a group chat

Caring for an ageing parent means medications, appointments, home visits, bills and forms, shared between siblings in different cities and often different countries. It runs on a group chat, a shared folder and whoever remembers. Things fall through, one person quietly carries most of it, and the professionals involved each see a fragment of a picture nobody holds whole.

For whomAdult children caring for parents · home-care workers · family doctors seeing only their slice
LinkedIn Send to someone

Framed by Ainna editorial

All 20 problems on the Index →

Residents can't find what their council decidedSolve it →

Reconnecting

Your strategic session is being restored.

Still reconnecting

This is taking longer than usual. Your work is safe.

Connection lost

We couldn't restore the connection. Your work has been preserved.

Session expired

Your session has ended. Reload to continue where you left off.