Skip to content

The Index · Public sector · Problem 0013

Digital identity exclusionPeople without ID lose the services that moved online

Benefits, banking, health records and school places are moving to interfaces that begin by asking you to prove who you are online. Hundreds of millions of people cannot prove who they are at all, and billions more have no digital means of doing it, so each service added to the digital channel quietly removes itself from the people who most need it, while the statistics record improved efficiency.

Inspired by reporting from World Bank ID4D

Who lives with it
People without foundational or digital ID · agencies moving services online · the frontline staff handling every exception by hand
Why now
World Bank ID4D data puts around 800 million people without official proof of identity and about 2.8 billion without an online digital ID, improving from 3.3 billion in 2021, with the steepest barriers still falling on women, rural populations and poorer households.
Why it matters
Digitising a service without a route for people who cannot authenticate does not reduce the work, it moves it to an exception queue nobody resourced. Tools that let agencies serve people who cannot authenticate online (assisted verification, trusted intermediaries, alternative credentials) are unglamorous, needed at scale, and a place a focused team can start.
From public reporting
Framed from public reporting. Here is what it was drawn from, so the framing can be checked against it:

Ainna frames what it reads; it does not report. Nothing on the Index comes from a user, and what you bring to Ainna is never published.

More on the Index

Three more worth solving.

Public sector

Unsearchable council recordsResidents can't find what their council decided

Local government publishes its decisions (planning, licensing, budgets, minutes) and publishing is where the obligation stops. They arrive as scanned documents with inconsistent names, in systems searchable only if you already know what you are looking for. A decision that changes a street is technically public and practically private.

For whomResidents and neighbourhood groups · local reporters · small developers and community organisations
LinkedIn Send to someone

Framed by Ainna editorial

Food

Unmeasured supply lossGrowers and buyers can't see the food lost between them

Loss happens at the handovers: field to packer, packer to distributor, distributor to shelf. Every party measures only its own side of each one. So each set of numbers looks defensible while the total is enormous, and the interventions that would work are precisely the ones nobody can see, because they sit between two businesses rather than inside one.

For whomGrowers and packers · distributors and independent retailers · redistribution charities working the same corridors
LinkedIn Send to someone

Inspired by reporting from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Health

Uncoordinated family careFamilies coordinate elder care in a group chat

Caring for an ageing parent means medications, appointments, home visits, bills and forms, shared between siblings in different cities and often different countries. It runs on a group chat, a shared folder and whoever remembers. Things fall through, one person quietly carries most of it, and the professionals involved each see a fragment of a picture nobody holds whole.

For whomAdult children caring for parents · home-care workers · family doctors seeing only their slice
LinkedIn Send to someone

Framed by Ainna editorial

All 20 problems on the Index →

People without ID lose the services that moved onlineSolve it →

Reconnecting

Your strategic session is being restored.

Still reconnecting

This is taking longer than usual. Your work is safe.

Connection lost

We couldn't restore the connection. Your work has been preserved.

Session expired

Your session has ended. Reload to continue where you left off.